Addendum to Paper on Detecting Agent Failures
ruslansv · x · 2026-07-09
This addendum clarifies that the method requires white-box activation access and relies on labeled calibration episodes (successes and failures). The author notes that this type of "high-recall certification" still faces significant limitations regarding sample complexity.
It has primarily been tested on TextCraft, but the original poster believes it remains one of the more practical agent monitoring papers this year, highly recommended for those interested in efficient harnesses and scalable agent systems.
Related event: New Paper Proposes Early Termination for Failing AI Agents(2 posts)→
More from coding & agent
- theo publishes tstack skills, Garry Tan urges everyone to 'publish your stack' — ycombinator · 2026-10-26
- Agent verified 'success' after double-voting: a lesson in harness vs model bugs — TejasKumar_ · 2026-10-26
- diginomica: agentic automation hype is overdone, and 'The Hackening' of enterprise security has begun — jonerp · 2026-10-26
- 'Vibe verification': ~60% of AI-written formal specs prove the wrong property — basedjensen · 2026-10-26
- Devin launches Security suite powered by Claude Mythos with $100M+ credits — DevinAI · 2026-10-26
- HackBench injects reward hacks into agent trajectories to stress-test monitors — DanielKhashabi · 2026-10-26