Insider: Gemini's Quality Issues Stem from No One Actually Viewing Data
giffmana · x · 2026-07-07
@giffmana pointed out a core issue with Gemini: despite everyone on the post-training team handling data, almost no one actually looks at it manually. Inside Google, manually reviewing data is considered unprestigious work. The team only processes data "algorithmically" without human oversight, causing data quality to slip. This cultural flaw is believed to be a deep-rooted reason for Gemini lagging behind in quality.
More from Models
- Kimi K3 may be strong on cyber, but token efficiency keeps it off UK AISIS — teortaxesTex · 2026-07-27
- European ChatGPT Plus users are now seeing an “Extra High” quality option — PressPlayPlease7 · 2026-07-27
- Opus 5 reportedly aces a car-racing game test on the first try — soumitrashukla9 · 2026-07-27
- Claude Opus 5 arrives at half the price and tops Frontier-Bench claims — GregCook2011 · 2026-07-27
- Open models may beat closed ones for cyber defense, researchers argue as Kimi K3 impresses — eliebakouch · 2026-07-27
- Opus 5 notices when its own generated game looks bad — Angaisb_ · 2026-07-27