Insider: Gemini's Quality Issues Stem from No One Actually Viewing Data
giffmana · x · 2026-07-07
@giffmana pointed out a core issue with Gemini: despite everyone on the post-training team handling data, almost no one actually looks at it manually. Inside Google, manually reviewing data is considered unprestigious work. The team only processes data "algorithmically" without human oversight, causing data quality to slip. This cultural flaw is believed to be a deep-rooted reason for Gemini lagging behind in quality.
More from Models
- Rumor claims Kimi faked performance by serving Claude; DeepSeek new model surprises in evals — realsohamparekh · 2026-09-11
- GPT-5.6 writes well but is instantly forgettable, user complains — BasedRaddka · 2026-09-11
- Opus Refuses Protein Research Codebase Over 'Safety' Concerns, Dev Considers Rolling His Own — josephdviviano · 2026-09-11
- User Hails Unconfirmed 'DeepSeek 4.1 Flash' as an Inflection Point in LLMs — himanshustwts · 2026-09-11
- Terminal Bench v4: GLM-5.3 Leads at 41.9%, Kimi-K3 Underwhelms at 12.6% — Ok_Warning2146 · 2026-09-11
- GPT-6 Astra beats Factorio with enemies in 44 in-game hours at ~$4,500 API cost — liminal_bardo · 2026-09-11