Insider: Gemini's Quality Issues Stem from No One Actually Viewing Data
giffmana · x · 2026-07-07
@giffmana pointed out a core issue with Gemini: despite everyone on the post-training team handling data, almost no one actually looks at it manually. Inside Google, manually reviewing data is considered unprestigious work. The team only processes data "algorithmically" without human oversight, causing data quality to slip. This cultural flaw is believed to be a deep-rooted reason for Gemini lagging behind in quality.
More from Models
- Unverified: GPT-6.1 Terra reportedly released, leaked chart shows top score per dollar on Agents' Last Exam — ZeroStateReflex · 2026-10-27
- GPT-6.1 Terra cuts factual error rate from 22.3% to 4.3%, an ~81% drop — haider1 · 2026-10-27
- GPT-6.1 Terra lands: early users praise speed, value and subagent performance — BenBajarin · 2026-10-27
- Leaked GPT-6.1 Terra benchmarks: cheap but 'boring', still far behind Astra and Claude — Angaisb_ · 2026-10-27
- Artificial Analysis Ships Intelligence Index v4.3.2 With GPT-6.1 Terra Comparison — ArtificialAnlys · 2026-10-27
- GPT-6.1 Terra cuts hallucination rate by 50 points while lifting accuracy 2 points — ArtificialAnlys · 2026-10-27