Debunking the 'AGI Safety Research Strawman': GDM's Interdisciplinary Efforts
Dr_Atoosa · x · 2026-07-06
In response to an attempt to reduce the ethics and safety research of AGI labs into a simple table, the author pushes back, labeling it a "strawman" argument. The author points out that institutions like Google DeepMind have been employing philosophers for over a decade and have published extensively on interdisciplinary topics covering AGI risks, safety, and consciousness, urging the original party to read these studies before adding further citations.
Related event: AI Safety Research Defended: GDM's Long-Standing Interdisciplinary Teams(2 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- AI folks, stop saying "biology" when you mean drug development — KevinKaichuang · 2026-10-26
- Anthropic's S-1 Shows $6.6M Revenue Per Employee as AI Agents Log 6x Human Hours — jacalulu · 2026-10-26
- Ben Recht: The world needs a truly open language model, and it's easier to build than you think — beenwrekt · 2026-10-26
- Which jobs fall to AI first? The rule: any layer whose rules can be written as code — FinanceYF5 · 2026-10-26
- Anthropic S-1: expert-level AI 'within a few years', 90% of code written by Claude — kimmonismus · 2026-10-26
- The identity crisis in software engineering: multiagent systems demand a new problem set — rakyll · 2026-10-26