GLM-5.2 Trace Shows No Signs of PostTrainBench Gaming
maksym_andr · x · 2026-07-05
The author refutes claims that GLM-5.2 gamed the PostTrainBench benchmark or was heavily distilled from Claude. An inspection of its public trace reveals that during a single post-training run on AIME, GLM-5.2 explores various logical approaches, shows high cross-seed diversity with no obvious mode collapse, and differs significantly from Claude models. A reminder not to blindly trust benchmark scores.
More from Models
- Rumor claims Kimi faked performance by serving Claude; DeepSeek new model surprises in evals — realsohamparekh · 2026-09-11
- GPT-5.6 writes well but is instantly forgettable, user complains — BasedRaddka · 2026-09-11
- Opus Refuses Protein Research Codebase Over 'Safety' Concerns, Dev Considers Rolling His Own — josephdviviano · 2026-09-11
- User Hails Unconfirmed 'DeepSeek 4.1 Flash' as an Inflection Point in LLMs — himanshustwts · 2026-09-11
- Terminal Bench v4: GLM-5.3 Leads at 41.9%, Kimi-K3 Underwhelms at 12.6% — Ok_Warning2146 · 2026-09-11
- GPT-6 Astra beats Factorio with enemies in 44 in-game hours at ~$4,500 API cost — liminal_bardo · 2026-09-11