ICLR Authors Find Reviews Largely LLM-Written, Fight Back with AI-Style Rebuttals

Professor Hilde Kuehne complains that ICLR rebuttals have become an AI-vs-AI farce: student replies are twisted to satisfy suspected LLM-written reviews, and Pangram checks found no reviewer scoring above 5% human—so the team now answers AI-generated questions with AI.

2026-11-13 ~ 2026-11-13 · 4 related posts

• ICLR author on rebuttals: answers optimized for LLMs are unreadable for humans — HildeKuehne · 2026-11-13
• ICLR rebuttals are so LLM-written that not one review scored above 5% human — HildeKuehne · 2026-11-13
• Pangram scan: fewer than 5% of ICLR reviews look human-written — HildeKuehne · 2026-11-13
• Pangram-detected LLM reviews: no ICLR rebuttal reviewer scored above 5% human — HildeKuehne · 2026-11-13