Chalmers and Seth Debate Computational Functionalism on Consciousness

Chalmers argues none of Seth's three reasons can falsify computational functionalism, while Seth defends the article's title as reflecting his team's beliefs, distinguishing claims that something is unproven from claims it is true or false.

2026-10-21 ~ 2026-10-21 · 2 related posts

• Seth on the title flap: it reflects our credences, and the case against CF goes beyond unproven — anilkseth · 2026-10-21
• Chalmers presses Seth: your three reasons don't actually argue against computational functionalism — davidchalmers42 · 2026-10-21