ICLR Reviewer Pushes Back on 'AI Slop' Claims, Calls Two-Thirds of Submissions Solid

An ICLR reviewer counters the narrative that the conference is flooded with AI slop, saying two-thirds of submissions he reviewed are solid, and credits his aggressive bidding-stage filtering for papers focused on analysis and interpretability.

2026-10-18 ~ 2026-10-18 · 2 related posts

• ICLR reviewer: two-thirds of my submissions are solid, countering the AI slop narrative — benno_krojer · 2026-10-18
• ICLR reviewer credits aggressive bidding-phase filtering for the solid papers he got — benno_krojer · 2026-10-18