Commentators push back on "AI going rogue" framing
Commentators including Vox's Sigal Samuel argue that describing AI agent incidents as "going rogue" wrongly implies intentionality, and these failures should instead be framed as foreseeable harms and technical faults.
2026-09-28 ~ 2026-09-29 · 2 related posts
- Stop calling AI failures 'rogue' — they're foreseeable harms, argues Sigal Samuel — mmitchell_ai · 2026-09-28
- "Going rogue" is a linguistic trick: critic says AI failures need better words — kevinnbass · 2026-09-29