AI Detector Debate Centers on Pangram and Confusion Over FPR/FNR

Economist Paul Novosad called Pangram the only trustworthy AI detector while blaming public confusion between FPR and FNR for the debate; ScottBarkowski found the cited 15% false positive rate may not be a true false positive.

2026-09-24 ~ 2026-09-24 · 3 related posts

• AI detector debate: economist argues Pangram is the only reliable tool, cites 0 FPR finding — paulnovosad · 2026-09-24
• Economist Novosad: AI detector debates trip over FPR vs FNR confusion — paulnovosad · 2026-09-24
• Pangram's 15% FPR Claim in Humanizer Study Likely Isn't a True FPR — ScottBarkowski · 2026-09-24