Third-Party AI Evaluations Criticized as Insider-Driven 'Nepo Review'

evijit criticized third-party pre-release AI evaluations, noting early-access evaluators are largely ex-lab employees and friends of founders. He argued that evaluations influencing AI governance policy should be open to public scrutiny.

2026-09-13 ~ 2026-09-13 · 2 related posts

• Third-party AI evals critiqued as insider clubs run by ex-lab employees — evijit · 2026-09-13
• Publicly consequential AI evals should be testable by the public, says researcher — evijit · 2026-09-13